Every business transaction can be conducted by a range of various payment collection methods depending on the amount involved, the settlement period, the type of customer, the nature of the business relationship between buyer and seller, the country in which the buyer is based, the payment customs of the particular industry or country and so on. No company that exports on a regular basis to a variety of countries uses the same payment collection method all the time. This is why it is important to have a wide range of methods available, each with its own characteristics. The choice of payment method needs to take into account the following factors:
To know what international payment means are available locally, please contact your Santander branch for more information.
Foreign banknotes are hardly ever used as a payment method in the context of international business transactions. The drawbacks can be summarized under Risks and Costs.
In addition, some countries have currency control regulations in place which may cause impediments.
This is issued by the holder of a current account at a banking institution against the funds that he or she has deposited there, and may be made out either to a named individual or the bearer. The exporter has no guarantee of being paid for the merchandise, despite having received the cheque, because payment depends on the validity of the drawer’s signature and whether or not there are sufficient funds in the account. The fulfilment of personal cheques is subject to the laws of the importer’s country, because there are some countries in which this form of paying for foreign goods is not permitted.
Apart from the risks associated with possible non-payment on the part of the buyer, there is also the problem of losing title to the goods, because all the commercial documents (invoice, shipping paperwork, insurance and so on) are sent directly to the importer. Personal cheques are used as an international payment method when there is a considerable degree of trust between the exporter and the importer.
This is a document issued by a bank at the request of an importer based in the same country, drawn against the bank itself or against another banking entity, normally located in another country, and made out to the exporter who is awaiting payment. Although there is no legal bar to doing so, it is not advisable to make these payable to the bearer. There is a major difference between drafts and personal cheques: a personal cheque is issued by someone against his or her current account, while a banker’s draft is made out by the issuing bank against the current account it has with the drawee bank. The advantage for the exporter lies in the fact that the payment commitment rests with the drawing bank/the bank that issued the draft. From the exporter’s perspective, the banking transaction takes place faster and more smoothly than with a personal cheque, especially if the bank in question enjoys a reputation for solvency and is located in a stable country.
Exporters are advised to use this payment method only in cases where there is a high degree of trust, the draft has been issued by a reputable bank and the country is not showing signs of default.
This is the payment method whereby the principal (importer) requests its bank to credit the account of the beneficiary (exporter) via a second bank (correspondent bank) with a specific sum of money. The transfer must state the reason for the payment.
The advantages of using this type of payment rather than cheques stem from the fact that it avoids such pitfalls as getting lost in transit, signatures being forged and so on.
This payment method is applied to cross-border sales and purchases of goods when there is a high degree of trust between the importer and exporter: the exporter continues shipping goods and documents in the confident expectation that the importer will honour its obligations.
This is a banking transaction in which the exporter enlists the help of his bank to manage the collection of certain financial documents (promissory notes, IOUs, cheques and so on) and/or non-financial documents (invoices, bills of lading, plant health certificates and so on), in exchange for a commitment or payment on receipt on the part of the importer. Depending on whether the documents are financial or non-financial, the remittance is known as ‘simple’ or ‘documented’. The legal framework is set out by the International Chamber of Commerce in its UNIFORM RULESconcerning the collection of debts.
With simple collections, the exporter sends the goods and the commercial documents directly to the importer and sends the financial paperwork separately via a financial institution, generally for a commitment to pay or actual payment. The originator must give precise and comprehensive instructions about how to proceed in the event of non-payment or any other legal formality that replaces them, as well as who must pay the charges and fees.
As far as risks are concerned, this payment method requires the exporter to take on virtually all the risks: by sending the commercial paperwork directly to the importer he loses title to the goods and incurs the risk of the former refusing to pay or commit to pay, as well as possible pitfalls stemming from the risks inherent in the country concerned.
With this method the exporter supplies his bank with various trading documents (invoices, bills of lading, plant health certificates and so on), possibly accompanied by a financial instrument (bill of exchange, IOU, receipt and so on), and instructions that they be delivered to the foreign importer, via his bank, against payment or commitment to pay for the financial instrument.
It is important to bear in mind that the exporter may face a situation in which the buyer rejects the goods; this may mean that, although they are still owned by him, they are located in a distant country and, as a consequence, he is confronted with additional storage charges, shipping costs in the event of having to re-import them, and even losses or penalties for delaying despatch.
1. Signing of contract, acceptance of order and so on.
2. The exporter sends the goods.
3. The paperwork certifying the despatch is received by the exporter.
4. The seller then goes to his bank with instructions for delivering the commercial paperwork to the buyer against the bill of exchange.
5 and 6. The exporter’s bank manages the transaction through the presenting bank, thereby reaching the importer.
7. After checking the paperwork, the importer/drawee accepts the bill of exchange.
8. and 9. The presenting bank gives him the commercial paperwork and proceeds to return the accepted bill of exchange to the exporter, via his bank.
10. and 11. The importer takes possession of the goods with the documents obtained.
This encompasses all agreements, regardless of their name or description, whereby a bank (the issuing bank), acting at the request of and in accordance with the instructions of a customer (the principal) or on its own behalf:
The legal framework is summarized by the International Chamber of Commerce and set out in the UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS.
The parties involved in a documentary credit (or letter of credit) are:
Depending on the commitment of the issuing bank
The UCP 600 states that documentary credits are always irrevocable (even when this is not mentioned). This means that documentary credits cannot be cancelled or modified under any circumstances, unless it is by the agreement of all the parties concerned (not only the principal and the beneficiary, but also the issuing and notifying banks).
The issuing bank requests an intermediary bank to add its ratification, in other words that it completely takes on the obligations it has towards the beneficiary. The security of the beneficiary is enhanced with these credits, since the risk associated with individual countries tends to be eliminated.
These are credits in which the intermediary bank adds no commitment whatsoever, limiting its role to notifying the beneficiary of the credit’s terms of use.
Depending on the place of payment:
It takes longer to collect payment in this case, because the paperwork has to be presented to the issuing bank before the payment is released.
The collection of payment is instantaneous upon presentation of the correct paperwork.
This is used in circumstances when the credit is denominated in a currency that differs from both the beneficiary’s and the issuer’s native currency and/or there is mutual mistrust with the issuing bank.
Depending on how they are used:
The bank undertakes to accept the bills drawn on its account or that of the principal.
The bank undertakes to discount without recourse concerning the drawer.
This type of documentary credit acts as a guarantee and is used above all in the USA where by law banks are not permitted to issue guarantees in the sense that this concept is understood in Europe.
The legal framework is summarized by the International Chamber of Commerce and comprises INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE concerning STANDBY CREDIT (http://www.iccwbo.org/ )